Amano was in the country to attend the 3rd Nuclear Congress, a multi-sectoral meeting assessing the progress made by the Philippines in using nuclear energy, along with the challenges in harnessing it.
However, talks about fueling the power facility were plenty 8 years ago. The Department of Energy (DOE) led the gargantuan task of drafting the country’s nuclear energy policy. Owner and operator National Power Corporation (NAPOCOR) signed a memorandum of understanding with the Korean Electric Power Company (KEPCO) to assess the viability of harnessing alternative energy in the aging station.
So those are two big ideas on offer for reviving nuclear power: Figure out how to more widely deploy a tested 20th-century technology that’s run into serious trouble, or invent something vastly superior. They are, in essence, two very different visions of the current political landscape. Below, I’ll flesh out each option, probing some pros and cons — and then ask what happens if they both stumble.
The is a mostly decommissioned production complex on the in the U.S. state of , operated by the . Plutonium manufactured at the site was used in the first , tested at the , and in , the bomb over , Japan. During the , the project was expanded to include nine nuclear reactors and five large complexes, which produced plutonium for most of the 60,000 weapons in the . Many of the early safety procedures and waste disposal practices were inadequate, and government documents have since confirmed that Hanford's operations released significant amounts of into the air and the Columbia River, which still threatens the health of residents and . The weapons production reactors were decommissioned at the end of the Cold War, but the decades of manufacturing left behind 53 million US gallons (200,000 m3) of , an additional 25 million cubic feet (710,000 m3) of solid radioactive waste, 200 square miles (520 km2) of contaminated groundwater beneath the site and occasional discoveries of undocumented contaminations that slow the pace and raise the cost of cleanup. The Hanford site represents two-thirds of the nation's high-level radioactive waste by volume. Today, Hanford is the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States and is the focus of the nation's largest .
Chemistry Essay on Nuclear Power ..
Historically many scientists and engineers have made decisions on behalf of potentially affected populations about whether a particular level of risk and uncertainty is acceptable for them. Many nuclear engineers and scientists that have made such decisions, even for good reasons relating to long term energy availability, now consider that doing so without informed consent is wrong, and that nuclear power safety and nuclear technologies should be based fundamentally on morality, rather than purely on technical, economic and business considerations.
StudentBoy: Position Essay on nuclear energy.
In 2014, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a United Nations-based organization that is the leading international body for the assessment of climate risk, issued a desperate call for more non-emitting power sources. According to the IPCC, in order to mitigate climate change and meet growing energy demands, the world must aggressively expand its sources of renewable energy, and it must also build more than 400 new nuclear reactors in the next 20 yearsâa near-doubling of today’s global fleet of 435 reactors. However, in the wake of the tsunami that struck Japan’s Fukushima Daichi plant in 2011, some countries are newly fearful about the safety of light water reactors. Germany, for example, vowed to shutter its entire nuclear fleet.
Free Essays on Nuclear Power Now
The young scientists entering the nuclear energy field know all of this. They understand that a major build-out of nuclear reactors could play a vital role in saving the world from climate disaster. But they also recognize that for that to happen, there must be significant changes in the technology of the reactors, because fear of light water reactors means that the world is not going to be willing to fund and build enough of them to supply the necessary energy. That’s what had sent Leslie and Mark into the library stacks at MITâa search for new ideas that might be buried in the old designs.